Disclosure: We are reader-supported. If you buy through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
Devlyn Steele of Augusta Precious Metals joined IncomeInsider TV to talk about a feeling many older Americans already know well: retirement does not feel as secure as it once did.
The concern, he argued, is not just about a bad week in the stock market. It is about whether years of saving will still translate into real buying power after inflation, debt, and government spending have done their damage.
Steele’s core message was that retirement savers need to stop thinking only in terms of account balances and start thinking in terms of what those dollars will actually buy in the years ahead.
Watch the full interview here:
For readers who would rather skim the key points than watch the full episode, here is the heart of the conversation.
The real fear is not just market volatility
Steele made the point early that most people approaching retirement are not simply afraid of a market dip. They are worried that the money they spent decades building may not hold up over time.
In his telling, retirement planning ultimately comes down to one practical question: will your savings support your lifestyle once the paycheck stops?
That means covering housing, food, healthcare, travel, family needs, and whatever surprises come later in life.
He argued that many Americans are uneasy because they can feel those costs moving in the wrong direction.
That distinction matters. A portfolio can look fine on paper while still losing ground in the real world. That is the deeper anxiety Steele was talking about.
Why this moment feels different
Sam Laliberte with Devlyn Steele on IncomeInsider TV
According to Steele, the current pressure on retirement savers is not appearing in a vacuum. He argued that after a stretch when things felt more stable, the post-COVID period exposed how fragile the system really is.
He pointed to heavy money creation, inflation that proved far more persistent than promised, and what he described as a “K-shaped” economy, where upper-income households may continue to thrive while middle-class families feel squeezed by everyday costs.
That theme will sound familiar to many conservative readers. The official message often says the economy is manageable, but the lived experience tells a different story.
Families are not measuring the economy through press conferences. They are measuring it at the grocery store, at the gas pump, and in the monthly bills that seem to climb no matter what Washington says.
Related: Bri Teresi Discusses Crypto, Metals, and Financial Sovereignty
Inflation is not abstract when you are the one paying for it
One of the sharper parts of the interview was Steele’s insistence that inflation is not just an economic number. It is something people live. In plain English, his point was that having more dollars on a statement means very little if those dollars buy less every year.
That is why older savers often feel the pressure before economists are ready to admit it. They are already living in the gap between headline returns and real-world purchasing power.
Steele described inflation as a hidden tax, and that framing is likely to resonate with a right-leaning audience. Even when official tax rates do not change, government debt and spending can still erode the value of what people earned and saved.
The result is the same in practical terms: your money does less, your margin for error shrinks, and retirement gets harder to plan for.
Steele’s blunt view of Washington’s role
The conversation also went straight at government spending. Steele argued that the problem is not confined to one party.
He said every president in recent decades has outspent the one before, regardless of party label, and that the result has been a cycle of more debt, more money creation, and a dollar that buys less over time. In his view, retirement savers are living with the consequences of that long-running pattern.
That is a big reason this interview fits a conservative financial audience. The message was not that Washington will eventually solve this. The message was almost the opposite. Steele’s warning was that savers should not assume the people running trillion-dollar deficits are somehow going to preserve the long-term value of their retirement dollars.
Related: Crash or Correction? Collin Plume Explains Gold's Recent Price Volatility
Why precious metals came up in the conversation
Since Steele works for Augusta Precious Metals, it was no surprise that the discussion turned to gold and silver. Still, his argument was more restrained than a simple sales pitch.
He explicitly said he was not telling people to sell everything, liquidate their portfolios, and move entirely into metals. His case was that many Americans are diversified only within the paper system and may need to think more seriously about owning at least some assets outside it.
One of his more memorable lines was that savers should think not just about diversifying assets, but about “diversifying your trust.”
His point was that many retirement accounts may look diversified on the surface, but they are still tied to the same basic system of banks, financial institutions, government debt, and the dollar itself. Gold and silver, in his view, offer a way to reduce total dependence on that structure.
Whether a reader fully agrees with that argument or not, it was one of the strongest ideas to come out of the interview.
Related: Download Devlyn Steele's Free Gold IRA Guide
Why more people still do nothing
Steele also tried to explain why so many Americans remain hesitant to own physical gold and silver even when they are uneasy about the direction of the economy.
His answer was that most people built their savings through employer retirement plans, where the default options are paper assets and the saver rarely has to make a truly independent decision.
Over time, that creates a habit of relying on institutions and advisors rather than taking an active role.
He also argued that many advisors have incentives to keep money inside the traditional system because their compensation depends on assets under management.
That does not mean every advisor is acting in bad faith, but it does help explain why alternatives outside the usual product shelf often get dismissed. Steele’s point was that passivity becomes dangerous when the system people have always trusted starts to look less stable.
Related: Learn More on Augusta Precious Metals' Website
The strongest message in the episode: no one will care more than you do
The most broadly useful part of the interview had less to do with metals and more to do with personal responsibility. Steele repeatedly said that nobody will care more about your retirement than you do.
He argued that Americans spend decades working for their money, yet often invest very little time understanding how to protect it. His challenge to listeners was simple: stop assuming someone else is going to manage all of this for you.
That is probably the line that will stay with readers the longest. It fits the audience perfectly because it puts the responsibility back where it belongs.
You do not need blind faith in Washington, Wall Street, or any one company. But you do need to know what you own, what risks you are carrying, and whether your current plan still makes sense in a changing economy.
Related: Shanon Davis Warns - Growing National Debt Unsustainable
Steele’s practical advice was not one-size-fits-all
To his credit, Steele did not offer a canned allocation formula. He specifically warned against cookie-cutter advice like telling everyone to put a fixed percentage into gold and silver.
He said the right answer depends on personal circumstances, including savings, expenses, Social Security, pensions, and retirement goals. He encouraged people to use calculators, seek education, and work through their own numbers rather than assuming there is a universal answer.
That made the interview more credible. Instead of pretending there is a magic number, Steele’s message was that people need to get serious about understanding their own situation.
Augusta’s argument for why it is different
The interview also gave Steele room to explain Augusta’s business model. He said the company uses salaried educators rather than commission-based salespeople, which he argued creates a lower-pressure experience for customers trying to learn about precious metals.
He contrasted that with both traditional financial advisors and other gold companies, where compensation can be more directly tied to gathering assets or closing a sale. He also said Augusta is transparent about making money on the spread between buy and sell prices.
Readers can judge that claim for themselves, but it was clearly part of Augusta’s broader pitch: education first, decision second.
Look beyond the headlines
This interview was really about a loss of confidence in the old assumptions. Steele’s warning was that retirement savers should not assume yesterday’s playbook will still work in a period defined by inflation, debt, monetary strain, and a federal government that shows little interest in fiscal restraint.
He argued that people nearing retirement need to think beyond market headlines and ask harder questions about purchasing power, diversification, healthcare costs, and long-term risk.
For readers who already distrust Washington’s ability to spend responsibly or borrow its way out of every problem, the message will land hard: retirement security is not just about growing an account. It is about protecting what that account can actually do for you when you need it most.
And on that point, whether someone agrees with Steele’s case for gold and silver or not, the broader takeaway is difficult to dismiss: hope is not a plan.
